..but it may not be enough to be right and point that out. The paradox of tolerance needs to be applied.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/article/2024/jul/01/biden-speech-supreme-court-trump-immunity
..but it may not be enough to be right and point that out. The paradox of tolerance needs to be applied.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/article/2024/jul/01/biden-speech-supreme-court-trump-immunity
Now that the SCOTUS has not just gone off the rails, but denied there is a railroad track by giving the office of the president carte blanche, I suggest our current President take the following actions, and label them clearly as actions that derive from his “constitutional duties” throughout the process:
This is the mildest reasonable response I can muster.
The checks and balances system only works if there are both checks and balances.
It’s 2024. I am not willing to serve a king, and neither should you.
It took me awhile to find a halfway reasonable take on the debate fallout, but here it is: “The pundit class turned on Biden. Does it matter?” Best quote:
“I was staying up late listening to everybody freak out on the phone calling Joe. And I literally was just shaking my head, going, ‘These people need to get diapers,’” she said.
What’s left of the GOP is awful, but the Democrats could learn a thing from them about loyalty. If they actually want to persuade Biden to step away from the nomination, drop-kicking him in less than a day isn’t the way to demonstrate you have his best interests in mind – or to show you give half a shit about anyone, or the electoral process, for that matter.