Categories
Writings

NCTE hijinks

So an organization that I am a member of, the National Council of Teachers of English, released this statement yesterday. It’s not long, so I’ll reproduce it here. I also got it in an email.

This week NCTE’s Committee Against Racism and Bias in the Teaching of English released a statement regarding the war in Israel and Palestine. The statement, as read, openly supports one side of the conflict and was unauthorized by NCTE leadership. We have received correspondence from members questioning who published the statement, what their role is, and wanting to make sure NCTE knew about it. This statement was not published by NCTE or its leadership team. Neither the Presidential Team of the Executive Committee nor NCTE staff were made aware of this statement prior to its publication.

As a leadership team, we deeply respect the varied opinions of our members. Intellectual freedom is critical to our organization, our members, and the students we serve.

We seek to ensure that members and the public are able to easily understand whose ideas are being espoused in statements and that NCTE and others are not intentionally or unintentionally misrepresented.

So, NCTE’s Standing Committee Against Racism and Bias In the Teaching of English apparently made “a statement regarding the war in Israel and Palestine,” but where? I can’t find it. Was it deleted? Did it only go out as an email, or on social media? It can’t be the “Celebrating Arab Narratives” post of 11/9, which doesn’t reference the war and was last week. Or is it? Who knows with this level of oblique reference.

Frankly, this is a really curious bit of rhetoric. It’s not a retraction. More of a disavowal. But there’s a sentence that is rather chilling: “We have received correspondence from members questioning who published the statement, what their role is, and wanting to make sure NCTE knew about it.”

This doesn’t make any sense. The members of the standing committee are public, unless that webpage is badly out of date, and even so, I don’t buy anyone innocently asking who wrote it, or what their role is, or even wanting to simply inform NCTE leadership about it.

Sure. Just some concerned citizens.

I wonder if anyone will clear this up. I can’t be the only confused and uninformed member of NCTE.

I also can’t be the only one worried about censorship. The 11/16 email/statement espouses academic freedom… but the tone says otherwise. It’s weird.

It’s not like I take my political cues from a gigantic organization like NCTE, or even my pedagogical ones, but many colleges and their respective organizations have let academic freedom slip into sixth or seventh place in the last couple of years, in terms of principles.

Update:

Ok, found a PDF circulating on social media. It seems to be an opening statement by the committee to be delivered at NCTE 2023 (Nov. 16-19). I am not confident I am reading the original, or the one to be actually delivered (or if it has been delivered orally), so I won’t reproduce it here; the file’s title is different from the title in the text, suggesting the language is/was in flux.

My earlier concerns about censorship hold. The PDF that I see names the committee, and as the members are public, the NCTE “response” remains… off.

Categories
Uncategorized

A Few Hiccups

I consolidated emails and domains today, and as a result, the blog was down for awhile. It is now restored, save for some images that I need to hunt down.

Categories
Humor Writings

The Potter-Taran Treatise, Appendix II

Perhaps I forgot a few. So here’s Appendix II, 19 years later, with knowledge of Books 6-7 of the Potterverse. Team Prydain is still winning.

Achren vs. Bellatrix

The former queen and evil enchantress of Prydain vs. the worst (or is it the best?) of the Death-Eaters.

You might think about this as a straight-up fight with spells and all that nonsense. You’d be wrong.

Bellatrix defeated quite a few named wizards in Books 5-7, and murdered Sirius and Dobby. On the negative side, though, she was just a speed bump for Dumbledore while he dueled Voldemort, her cruelty is tempered by fear of her master, and as she was finally smoked by Molly Weasley, she literally was killed by the power of love.

Achren is not someone you can kill with the power of love. She once was more powerful than Arawn, and never forgot it. Even his seizure of Annuvin did not stop her quest for power – and neither the destruction of Spiral Castle, nor the crumbling of Caer Colur. She was cunning enough to retreat to Caer Dallben to lick her wounds and do the dishes, clever enough to switch sides and aid the companions – and calculating enough to get her revenge on Arawn whilst seemingly powerless. She lived on her terms.

Bellatrix was ever a follower. Achren was always a queen, even in death. Bellatrix will serve her purposes, one way or another.

Advantage: Achren.

Morda vs. Dolores Umbridge

Who’s the vilest from each set of novels?

Morda, the lich murderer of Eilonwy’s mother, is up there. And even in a field including Voldemort, Umbridge has no real competition. If these two were ever once human, it was long ago.

Unfortunately for the winner of Hogwarts’s Worst Administrator Ever award, finding the hiding place of Morda’s phylactery requires having a loyal and inquisitive crow, and Umbridge loves nothing save herself.

Alas, she will spend the rest of her miserable excuse for a life as a blind worm.

Advantage: Morda.

Coll vs. Remus Lupin

Outwardly cheerful, helpful, wise, and damn good in a fight, but they’ve got some dark secrets, and they ultimately fall in battle – the fate of many a good man.

But the veteran Coll is too smart to tangle with a wizard, and after a lifetime of concealing his nature, Lupin tends to act only in defense and only if necessary.

They will circle each other for a bit and then agree to withdraw.

Perhaps there will be an exchange of chocolate and turnips.

I guess we’ll never know.

Advantage: Tie.

Glew vs. Argus Filch

Little men with cats and a grand ambition to be big; if only their actions matched their ambitions.

If Glew is still a giant, no contest. If Glew is not a giant (and Llyan is not involved) Filch’s casual cruelty, janitorial longevity, and squib resentment might win out. It wouldn’t be pretty.

Mrs. Norris has no effect either way.

Advantage: Filch.

Adaon vs. Cedric Diggory

While not quite adults, they are role models for the protagonists, and in storytelling terms, they serve the same function – guilt. Taran feels his decision to pursue the Cauldron got Adaon killed, and likewise, Harry feels responsible for Cedric’s murder. They are both wrong, of course.

Cedric is a strong young wizard, but he only “wins” the Tri-Wizard tournament with Harry’s help, and Pettigrew kills him in an eyeblink.

Adaon would know of any conflict with Cedric the night before it occurred, courtesy of the powers of his iron brooch. He turns events to his favor, perhaps by avoiding direct conflict altogether. Cedric’s failure to escape the trap at the end of the tournament is a clear sign he has no defense.

Advantage: Adaon.

Morgant vs. Gilderoy Lockhart

One is a warrior king that has saved Gwydion’s life several times. The other is really good at, ah, memory charms. But they’re both the turncoat antagonists of the second book of each series: Morgant betrays the companions for the power of the Cauldron, and Lockhart is ever anxious to preserve his fake reputation, even by stealing the memories of innocent children right when they’re… wow, those two books kind of line right up.

So it seems Morgant and Lockhart are fated to do battle.

Alas, Morgant has a large and loyal war band that always follows him around. He captures the companions (and Ellidyr beforehand) with a single verbal command. I see no reason this would go any differently. Without his wand, Lockhart is helpless (and he’s not very good with it, as Snape demonstrated).

First into the cauldron.

Advantage: Morgant.

Pryderi vs. Lucius Malfoy

The quest for power and station rarely ends well. Pryderi betrayed the Sons of Don for empty promises from Arawn and met his match via whatever mystical voltage the Book of Three puts out. Lucius Malfoy played both sides as well, and only escaped a second stint in Azkaban after switching for a final time against Voldemort to protect his son.

The only difference, perhaps, is that Lucius is far more cowardly, and that makes Pryderi, armed with a dagger from the hand of Arawn himself, unstoppable.

Advantage: Pryderi.

Hen Wen vs. Sybill Trelawny

I don’t recommend fighting with an ocular pig. You’ll get muddy and the pig will have seen it coming.

The physical realm seems completely unsuited to this contest. So let’s get serious for once and look at the prophecies themselves.

Sybill’s is this:

The one with the power to vanquish the Dark Lord approaches. Born to those who have thrice defied him, born as the seventh month dies, and the Dark Lord will mark him as his equal, but he will have power the Dark Lord knows not, and either must die at the hand of the other for neither can live while the other survives. The one with the power to vanquish the Dark Lord will be born as the seventh month dies.

Whether this prophecy concerns Harry or Neville or someone else is not answered for some time, but it is not a hard read. So, points for comprehension, if not style.

As for the pig, Dallben asks her where to find Dyrnwyn in The High King:

Ask, sooner, mute stone and voiceless rock to speak.

Completely useless… and completely accurate, and more concise, too.

However, that’s not all. Dallben then attempts to get clarity, which results in the letter sticks shattering, but not before Hen Wen delivers the goods:

Quenched will be Dyrnwyn’s flame

Vanished, its power.

Night turn to noon

And rivers burn with frozen fire

Ere Dyrnwyn be regained.

I don’t know about you, but something epic is about to go down.

Advantage: Hen Wen.